Wallet
m (→Type 2: minor update) |
m (minor rewordings) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
'''Pros''' |
'''Pros''' |
||
| − | * 'just right' amount of storage of different types |
+ | * 'just right' amount of storage of different types (2 banknote bays, and 8 card bays) |
'''Cons''' |
'''Cons''' |
||
* Tape providing closure means people assume the wallet is a duct tape wallet, when it clearly is not! |
* Tape providing closure means people assume the wallet is a duct tape wallet, when it clearly is not! |
||
| − | Note: Tape only holds sides together. The tyvek is a single structure folded. |
+ | Note: Tape only holds sides together. The wallet is folded from a single (cut to shape) sheet of tyvek. |
== Type 2 == |
== Type 2 == |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
'''Pros''' |
'''Pros''' |
||
| − | * Pure tyvek construction (no tape required) |
+ | * Pure tyvek construction (no tape required) from a single sheet. |
'''Cons''' |
'''Cons''' |
||
| − | * The folds used do not hold the ends quite as firmly closed as I would like - resulting in a feel that if I dropped it just wrong, the wallet would dissasemble and contents would come flying out. |
+ | * The folds used do not hold the ends quite as firmly closed as I would like - resulting in a feel that if I dropped it just wrong, the wallet would dissasemble and contents would come flying out. (in practice this has not happened, but I do find I'm re "tucking in" one end very regularly. |
| − | * As the paper-grade tyvek gets used, it slowly will lose rigidity (though not strength). |
+ | * In use, the paper-grade tyvek is losing rigidity (but not structure) - this is most noticable on the inside divider. It is also losing a little bit of structure on the outer faces, in a similar but much slower manner as the fabric-grade tyvek. |
| − | * Not quite enough seperation of card storage areas for my taste (Type1 has 8 non-bill-sleeve card bays! Type2 has 2) |
+ | * Not quite enough seperation of card storage areas for my taste (only 2 card bays compared to the 8 in Type 1) |
Revision as of 10:36, 18 March 2008
Wallets are simultaneously generic (almost every guy and alot of girls have one), and highly personal. (In my very small questioning, people are more attached to their wallet than they are to, say, their mobile phone)
Thus wallet design is big business.
Prologue
I am a wallet snob. Sometime around 1999 (for a guess), I bought a wallet. A nice little tri-fold leather number, with multiple card slots, two note sleeves, and NO coin pouch (so: no zips or clips). Result? A small clean wallet which suits my minimal slimline non-bulky (I like to call this style 'efficient') tastes.
Sometime around, oh, probably 2003, I realised I'd need a new wallet one day, and so started keeping my eye out for a replacement.
Cue 2005... I'm pretty seriously looking for a replacement...
By 2006 I'm starting to ask people everywhere. An identical to the one I had would have been perfect. Sadly, not findable. So in increasing desperation, I start a duct-tape wallet, but quickly stop, realising my long-standing instinct regarding Duct Tape wallets is in fact correct. ie, it will be too bulky. (I stopped half way through making it, when it was already as thick closed as my empty 'live' wallet. Clearly this was not going to be feasible. I return to looking for a wallet to buy...
I buy a 'magic wallet' style, but whilst I like it's size and nifty opening methods, it's not suitable for carrying all the myriad of knicknacks I keep in my wallet. (yes, dispite being way slim and minimal).
2007: I discover tyvek (wondrous stuff) and resurrect making my own wallet idea. Origami style! (I have found Tyvek wallets online (both professional and how-to guides to make your own), but none appealed). I make several paper prototypes, then a tyvek prototype which sees live testing...
Feb 2008: My tyvek prototype1 (Type 1 design) has been in use for a few months, however one of it's fatal flaws is that it's made from fabric-grade tyvek which has worn badly along one flat surface with use. And so I move onto onto prototype2 (Type 2 design) made from paper-grade tyvek.
Type 1
A tri-fold wallet from a single sheet of tyvek, however requiring tape (duct and/or gaffa) for structure.
Features twin note sleeves, and multiple card pouches, and one extremely-difficult-to-access non-obvious 'secret compartment'.
Pros
- 'just right' amount of storage of different types (2 banknote bays, and 8 card bays)
Cons
- Tape providing closure means people assume the wallet is a duct tape wallet, when it clearly is not!
Note: Tape only holds sides together. The wallet is folded from a single (cut to shape) sheet of tyvek.
Type 2
A trifold tyvek wallet made origami style. Tyvek cut to shape, then folded. No tape required.
Features twin note sleeved, and a single card pouch on each side. Secret compartment also features - still non obvious, much easier access.
Pros
- Pure tyvek construction (no tape required) from a single sheet.
Cons
- The folds used do not hold the ends quite as firmly closed as I would like - resulting in a feel that if I dropped it just wrong, the wallet would dissasemble and contents would come flying out. (in practice this has not happened, but I do find I'm re "tucking in" one end very regularly.
- In use, the paper-grade tyvek is losing rigidity (but not structure) - this is most noticable on the inside divider. It is also losing a little bit of structure on the outer faces, in a similar but much slower manner as the fabric-grade tyvek.
- Not quite enough seperation of card storage areas for my taste (only 2 card bays compared to the 8 in Type 1)
