User talk:Kiarash
It is been said that an author’s emotional preferences can be traced thorough his words. From the late half of nineteenth century that claimed proved to be more than just a saying and turned into not only a scientific fact but a science itself. Whether the attempt to develop such science was entirely located it’s arrowhead toward the neutrality of other methods to describe such things or not, it led to a place where we can discover a variety of emotions, crisis and even smallest lapses of a written word’s life. While being concerned with the newly accomplished knowledge of literary theory for years, that benefits the psychoanalytic discoveries by a gross extent, I have arrived to a conclusion that will be described through this short paper. This text will provide its reader with a very sincere approach, as it is required in every scientific method, to the possible positions concerning an interactive or non-interactive readership relation between the author and the text. This method is taken to trial in only one criteria of narcissism and the consideration of an exposed self-conscious ego. This brief strive will demonstrate the approach as a true and cogent standpoint toward a text and is not implicated within the psychoanalytic theory itself. The later achievements for having this thesis a vastly developed system of ideas will be in the hands of time, chances and its own potentials.
A text of mere report nature is denoted by the absence of its author’s choice in altering the subject of its text regarding the desired fidelity of the description to the object/event it describes. Hence it is defined by the separated nature of one’s self experience with the subject and the real discourse of it(Merrill, 1984). Rational justifications, most commonly the feature of enlightenment are functional methods in writing such literature. As the author excludes himself from the subject texts, the more he succeeds the text becomes about the subject and as he engages his own imaginary experience- that is for one to put himself into a position that is supposed and has never been experienced- or his encounters with the reality of that event, the description becomes more associated with the subjectivity of its author.
In respect to the process where a text is written in a certain lifecycle, from where it is started and where it ends, one can generally define two different natures of a written text by considering its lifecycle as continuos or discreet. A continuously written text is that it is written from the beginning to its end without a break. As the text develops, later the author find himself estranged from what he had in the start. Worrying the loss of memory and oblivion among the features of man’s mind, he can be fully determined of the plot and structure, and other supposed universals in the text, but yet there are various details that may come to be forgotten. The only neurotic intruder here will be the authors notion of his own oblivion. That may put the aware author into an anxiety of being forgetful that gradually increases through the text’s lifecycle or writing time. This temporal discourse is located in the outside world and not within the temporality of the text itself.
Any attempt to halt this anxiety will be a tendency to reread the text in order to having access to what has been forgotten or what is thought to be forgotten in author’s mind. Wayne Wickelgren, 1974 has come to the conclusion that, in direct functions when mind is creating an emblem of it self or is taking part in an emotional act, in normal condition will not forget in less than a week.
The thesis is based upon how a cue-dependent forgetting happens when the memory is temporarily lost while the stimuli of its encoding is absent. While the author has to have a universal of the text co=lose at hand, either by the remembrance or by present evidence, forgetting caused by the lack of its stimuli is highly unlikely.
In contrary a text of discreet nature, that is to say the text is written not continually but with a revisiting/rereading fashion implied by its author depicts different response to oblivion. As he forgets or desires to go back and see what he has brought into text he rereads the transferred features of his own discourse. --Kiarash Alimi 08:19, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
