Cricket Statistics

From ThorxWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(seso)
 
(save early, save often)
Line 22: Line 22:
 
A more real world example... near the end of BBL|06, Brisbane Heat power hitters Brendon McCullum and Chris Lynn had very similar Strike Rates, but their power and effectiveness showed the differences between them
 
A more real world example... near the end of BBL|06, Brisbane Heat power hitters Brendon McCullum and Chris Lynn had very similar Strike Rates, but their power and effectiveness showed the differences between them
   
: Brendon McCullum; 174(
+
: Brendon McCullum
  +
; 174.59 (287.84 * 0.607)
  +
: Chris Lynn
  +
; 177.59 (259.66 * 0.68)
   
  +
Thus we see that although Lynn is reknown as THE big hitter, McCullum is actually a bigger hitter, but turns balls into runs less often.
   
  +
My analysis of BBL|06 finds most players have an Effectiveness between 0.5 and 0.8, and power between 170 up to 300
  +
  +
(full analysis including graph is here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19xSGcEfJyDL8suXF08gP2XQLgbXj8yEMTa4lWs_LtoE/edit#gid=293175017 )
   
 
== History ==
 
== History ==

Revision as of 16:59, 19 January 2017

This page will detail my proposed "Power" and "Effectiveness" statistics for Cricket batsmen.

Contents

Power

ie "Scoring Strokes Strike Rate"

This is exactly as implied - the strike rate but only counting scoring strokes. So where a normal strike rate can be a value between 0 and 600 (600 being a 6 on every ball faced - unlikely to last long, but possible (I'm also discounting the rare possibility of a 7+ from a single ball), the 'power' strike rate is a value between 100 and 600.

Effectiveness

aka "Balls faced run conversion rate"

This is a value that measures how well the batter can convert balls faced into runs on the board - it's measured as a fraction from 0 (every ball faced is a dot ball) through to 1 (batter never concedes a dot ball)

Compared to traditional statistics

The traditional Strike Rate is simply "power*effectiveness", so I propose that these be given together as:


StrikeRate (power * effectiveness)

Where the strike rate gives an indication of how strong a batter is, it doesn't distinguish between a batter who makes occasional big hits, and a batter who makes regular small hits. (eg, hypothetical batter 'A' scores a single off every ball. Whilst 'B' scores a four every fourth ball. Both have a strike rate of 100, but A gets their 100 by 100*1, whilst B gets it by 400*0.25.

A more real world example... near the end of BBL|06, Brisbane Heat power hitters Brendon McCullum and Chris Lynn had very similar Strike Rates, but their power and effectiveness showed the differences between them

Brendon McCullum
174.59 (287.84 * 0.607)
Chris Lynn
177.59 (259.66 * 0.68)

Thus we see that although Lynn is reknown as THE big hitter, McCullum is actually a bigger hitter, but turns balls into runs less often.

My analysis of BBL|06 finds most players have an Effectiveness between 0.5 and 0.8, and power between 170 up to 300

(full analysis including graph is here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19xSGcEfJyDL8suXF08gP2XQLgbXj8yEMTa4lWs_LtoE/edit#gid=293175017 )

History

'Effectiveness' came about from trying to create a cricket equivalent to the Baseball "batting average" statistics, which measures how many times the batsman hits the ball compared to times at bat.


See also

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
meta navigation
More thorx
Tools